I am the client that was referred to in this original thread De-Tagging entries which then get deleted however the item line in question was not a manual entry, it was created by an automated bank feed and therefore and was not created by the tagging.
Therefore please can you investigate why these lines were deleted when I untagged them.
So what I’ve noticed is, if you have transactions tagged as transfers between accounts, sometimes if you untag the transaction that gets tagged by tagging the other bank account as a transfer it will delete the transaction.
For example say bank A and bank B.
I tag bank B transaction to bank A and match the corresponding transaction.
Now if I go to bank A and untag it, it sometimes deletes the transaction in bank B.
The only way around this is to untag from bank B.
So to confirm, are you untagging the original transaction you tagged as a transfer or are you untagging the tag that was assigned to the bank entry from the other account?
If you create a bank entry from tagging as a transfer instead of matching it to an already existing entry then of course, if you de tag it will delete the created transaction.
To me that seems logical since the entry was created by the tag. Untagging would uncreate it.
I guess the methodology behind it is, multiple tagging / untagging may create multiple transactions.
But that’s what I’m saying - the original transaction was not created by the tagging, and that is what is has deleted.
It was created via an automatic bank feed and therefore should never have been removed. I understand removing the “tagged” transaction, but this is not what it has done.